![]() ![]() “The academic world is a jungle,” wrote Schinner, who first applied statistical analytics to the manuscript more than a decade ago, “and like in any jungle, it is not recommended to show even potential weakness.” In Cheshire’s case, the University of Bristol retracted a press release highlighting his paper after other experts roundly challenged his research.Īndreas Schinner, a physicist, recounted in an email a rumor that the Voynich manuscript can be “pure poison” for a scholarly career, because when studying the manuscript, there’s “always an easy option to make a ridiculous mistake.” Thus far, however, every claim of a Voynich solution-including both of last year’s-has been either ignored or debunked by other experts, media outlets, and Voynich obsessives. And earlier that year, Gerard Cheshire, an academic at the University of Bristol, published a peer-reviewed paper in the journal Romance Studies arguing that the script is a mix of languages he called “proto-Romance.” Just last summer, an anthropologist at Foothill College in California declared that the text was a “ vulgar Latin dialect” written in an obscure Roman shorthand. Known as the Voynich manuscript, it defies classification, much less comprehension.Īnd yet, over the years a steady stream of researchers has stepped up with new claims to have cracked its secrets. ![]() It’s an approximately 600-year-old mystery that continues to stump scholars, cryptographers, physicists, and computer scientists: a roughly 240-page medieval codex written in an indecipherable language, brimming with bizarre drawings of esoteric plants, naked women, and astrological symbols. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |